Dragonflies in distress: Scientists sound alarm in India's ecological hotspot
A two-year study on dragonflies and damselflies in India's Western Ghats has identified 143 species, including 40 endemic ones, but found nearly 35% of previously recorded species missing. Scientists suggest this decline may signal ecosystem degradation due to habitat loss and human activity. The research highlights the need for better monitoring and conservation in this biodiversity hotspot.
- ▪The study documented 143 dragonfly and damselfly species across five Indian states in the Western Ghats from 2021 to 2023.
- ▪At least 79 species previously recorded in the region were not found, indicating a potential 35% decline in local populations.
- ▪Seven new species were discovered, including one named Protosticta armageddonia, referencing the term 'ecological armageddon'.
- ▪Dragonflies and damselflies are considered bioindicators, meaning their decline can reflect broader ecosystem health issues.
- ▪The Western Ghats is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and home to over 30% of India's plant and animal species, many of which are endemic.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Dragonflies in distress: Scientists sound alarm in India's ecological hotspot2 hours agoShareSaveAdd as preferred on GoogleCherylann MollanMumbaiChatur Ullu LabDamselflies are smaller than dragonflies and have thin, needle-like bodiesA first-of-its-kind study of dragonfly and damselfly species in India's Western Ghats - one of the world's most important biodiversity hotspots - has revealed findings that are both fascinating and worrying.The study, which was funded by the Indian government's Department of Science and Technology and held across two years (2021-2023) and five Indian states, found that 143 different species of dragonflies and damselflies inhabit the Western Ghats, with at least 40 of them being endemic to the region, meaning they are found nowhere else in the world.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at BBC News.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from BBC News
