WATCH: Andy Burnham Opposed Landmark Ruling to Protect Single-Sex Spaces
Andy Burnham has publicly opposed the Supreme Court's ruling regarding the definition of 'sex' in the Equality Act. He criticized the guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission, arguing it has created confusion regarding single-sex spaces. Burnham advocates for reforming the Gender Recognition Act to better support trans and non-binary communities.
- ▪The Supreme Court ruled that 'sex' in the Equality Act refers to biological sex.
- ▪Burnham believes the interim guidance from the EHRC has not clarified the situation.
- ▪He has previously called for gender self-identification to become law to support trans individuals.
- ▪Burnham's authority has invested significantly in diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Andy Burnham publicly opposed the Supreme Court judgement on trans people and criticised the guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission that resulted from it. A judgement which was the bane of woke campaigners everywhere… The Supreme Court ruled that “sex” in the Equality Act means biological sex, meaning a trans woman is legally a man and a trans man legally a woman for the purposes of the Act, regardless of whether they hold a Gender Recognition Certificate. The EHRC’s interim guidance directed that single-sex facilities must be restricted by biological sex, while stating trans people should not be left with no facilities. Burnham told LBC: “I think it has become more confusing in the real world as a as a result.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Guido Fawkes.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Guido Fawkes
