Trump’s TPS immigration crackdown faces Supreme Court test
The Supreme Court is set to hear cases regarding the Trump administration's attempt to end Temporary Protected Status for Haiti and Syria. The court will evaluate whether federal law allows for judicial review of the administration's decision to rescind TPS. The outcome could significantly impact similar protections for other countries facing similar situations.
- ▪The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the cases Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Moit.
- ▪The administration argues that federal law prohibits judicial review of TPS termination decisions.
- ▪Lawyers for affected immigrants claim that removing review would grant the Executive excessive power.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The Supreme Court will hear a pair of cases in which the Trump administration is trying to end Temporary Protected Status for Haiti and Syria on Wednesday, marking the latest major test to the administration’s immigration agenda at the high court. The justices will hear oral arguments in the consolidated cases Mullin v. Doe and Trump v. Moit, where they will examine whether federal law bars review of Trump’s decision to rescind TPS for people from the two countries. The Supreme Court’s ruling over whether Trump may end TPS for Haiti and Syria will have sweeping effects on the administration’s efforts to end similar temporary protections for various other countries, including Venezuela, South Sudan, and Somalia.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
