These controversial ‘pop-up’ Sydney cycleways are here to stay
Sydney's temporary COVID-era bike lanes on Moore Park Road and Fitzroy Street will remain in place as the City of Sydney moves to make them permanent, despite ongoing opposition from some residents. The council cites increased cycling, safety improvements, and high removal costs as key reasons for retention. A formal review and public consultation will determine their long-term status later this year. The decision highlights tensions over urban space allocation in dense inner-city areas.
- ▪The Moore Park Road and Fitzroy Street cycleways, installed temporarily in 2020, are being considered for permanent status by the City of Sydney Council.
- ▪Cycling usage has surged, with an 89% increase on Moore Park Road and 74% on Fitzroy Street since 2023, exceeding 1,000 riders daily on peak days.
- ▪No cyclist fatalities or serious injuries have occurred on the corridors since the lanes were installed, compared to prior incidents before their introduction.
- ▪Residents along the routes have raised concerns about reduced parking, delivery issues, and perceived safety risks from fast-moving e-bike riders.
- ▪The council estimates removing the lanes would cost over $1 million, influencing the decision to retain them pending a final review.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","dateModified":"2026-04-28T19:00:00Z","datePublished":"2026-04-28T19:00:00Z","description":"A contentious pair of COVID-era “pop-up” bike lanes linking Sydney’s east to the CBD is set to remain in place despite opposition.","headline":"These controversial ‘pop-up’ Sydney cycleways are here to stay","keywords":"City life, For subscribers, Clover Moore, Cycling, Sydney councils, Public transport, Planning, Moore Park, Sydney, Bike sharing, Just in SMH","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"David Barwell","jobTitle":"Urban affairs…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Sydney Morning Herald.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Sydney Morning Herald
