Pangram Is Good
The article evaluates AI writing detectors, emphasizing that false positives are a major concern, especially in academic settings. Pangram is presented as a more reliable option compared to competitors like GPTZero, which reportedly produces higher false positive rates. While AI tools can assist in writing, the author stresses the importance of maintaining original voice and effort to avoid producing low-quality, AI-generated content.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Many of the initial wave of “AI writing detectors” were quite bad. The biggest issue you need to be concerned about with an AI writing detector is false positives. If you are a professor and want to check students’ writing, it is very bad to falsely accuse a student. The Pangram product, though, is quite good, and I suggest folks check it out. The other main competitor on the market, GPTZero, is clearly lower quality (such as saying the Constitution is AI generated). GPTZero in their documentation says they are the most accurate AI detector. One of the reasons you don’t really care about accuracy is that you cannot know the underlying rate of AI writing in any corpus except in the scenario where it is artificially generated.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Andrew Wheeler.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Andrew Wheeler
