ICML final decisions rant [D]
·
0 reactions
·
0 comments
·
5 views
So, ICML accepted ~6.5K of ~24K; obviously, it doesn't mean that all the rejected papers are "bad," and these rejected papers would cascade to NeurIPS, blowing up NeurIPS' total submission count, and this cycle of massive-influx-small-acceptance would repeat on an endless loop. The reviews themselves can be frustratingly inadequate: "Only 200 benchmarks included, didn't show performance on this other benchmark" (exaggerated for dramatic effect, sadly doesn't seem so unrealistic); or "I don't thi
Original article
Machine Learning
Anonymous · no account needed
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Machine Learning
Visualizing Loss Landscapes of Neural Networks [P]
Machine Learning·12
Real World Physics-Informed AI Applications [D]
Machine Learning·0
Looking for feedback on OpenVidya: an open-source AI classroom layer for NCERT/CBSE [R]
Machine Learning·7
[D] Self-Promotion Thread
Machine Learning·8
UAI Rebuttal [D]
Machine Learning·8
public reviews in conferences [D]
Machine Learning·12