public reviews in conferences [D]
·
0 reactions
·
0 comments
·
10 views
Why don't all conferences make reviews public? I find ICLR public reviews to be very useful : - I get an idea of how others in the field think about the work - Makes the publishing process more transparent - Reviewers will potentially spend more effort to avoid public scrutiny Are there any drawbacks in having ICLR-like public reviews? (where the reviewer identifies are masked) Would the community benefit if all conferences released their reviews?
Original article
Machine Learning
Anonymous · no account needed
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Machine Learning
Visualizing Loss Landscapes of Neural Networks [P]
Machine Learning·12
ICML 2026 Position Track Decision [D]
Machine Learning·6
Self-calibrating cross-camera homography for real-time ghost prediction in multi-camera person tracking[P]
Machine Learning·5
What benchmark would you build for “reply quality” in SDR generation? [D]
Machine Learning·3
[ECCV 2026] Review Discussion [D]
Machine Learning·5
Is it just me or is the Conference Lottery culture killing research? [D]
Machine Learning·7