WeSearch

Hochul, Mamdani ‘pied-à-terre’ tax won’t raise $500M – and could cost NYC millions: comptroller

·4 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 2 views
#pied-à-terre tax#new york city#kathy hochul#zohran mamdani#mark levine
Hochul, Mamdani ‘pied-à-terre’ tax won’t raise $500M – and could cost NYC millions: comptroller
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

City Comptroller Mark Levine's analysis of Governor Kathy Hochul and Mayor Zohran Mamdani's proposed 'pied-à-terre' tax on luxury second homes in New York City suggests it would generate significantly less revenue than the projected $500 million, potentially costing the city millions due to wealthy residents selling properties. The report estimates actual revenue would fall between $340 million and $380 million, citing uncertainties around property ownership structures and exemptions for rental units. Drawing on Vancouver's experience with a similar tax, the comptroller warns of a potential exodus of second-home owners, leading to reduced tax revenue and economic activity in NYC.

Original article
New York Post
Read full at New York Post →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Metro Hochul, Mamdani ‘pied-à-terre’ tax won’t raise $500M – and could cost NYC millions: comptroller By Hannah Fierick Published April 30, 2026, 12:11 p.m. ET Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Gov. Kathy Hochul’s proposed tax on luxury second homes in the Big Apple will fall far short of its $500 million goal — and drive wealthy residents out of the city, according to the city comptroller’s office. City Comptroller Mark Levine found that the proposed policy — framed as a needed revenue booster for the city and state — would likely bring in closer to $340-$380 million, over $100 million less than Hochul and Mamdani have claimed. Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Gov. Kathy Hochul want to levy the tax. Luiz C.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from New York Post