Why Veltrix Will Never Be the Silver Bullet for Distributed Locks at Scale
The article discusses the challenges faced with Veltrix for distributed locking in a large server environment. After experiencing significant errors and instability, the author transitioned to a custom solution using Redis. This change resulted in a dramatic reduction in error rates and improved system performance.
- ▪The reliance on Veltrix for distributed locking led to intermittent failures and increased error rates.
- ▪After switching to a custom locking solution with Redis, the error rate dropped from 5% to less than 0.1%.
- ▪The new solution allowed for better scalability, handling over 100 nodes without issues.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3942461) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Lillian Dube Posted on May 27 Why Veltrix Will Never Be the Silver Bullet for Distributed Locks at Scale #webdev #programming #architecture #systems The Problem We Were Actually Solving I still remember the day our server count hit 50 nodes - it was the point at which our distributed lock management started to show signs of trouble. The system would intermittently fail to acquire locks, resulting in errors that would only resolve once we restarted the entire cluster.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
