White House suggests ‘no better addition’ to Mount Rushmore than Trump
Just days after Trump was inaugurated to serve his second presidential term, Rep. “Mount Rushmore, a timeless symbol of our nation’s freedom and strength, deserves to reflect his towering legacy—a legacy further solidified by the powerful start to his second term.”Trump himself has never publicly endorsed the idea, but he has also not shot it down. Many have floated the idea of giving him the Nobel Peace Prize, naming airports after him, and making his birthday a federal holiday.The president is set to give his Fourth of July speech in South Dakota at 8:30 p.m. local time on Friday.
- ▪Just days after Trump was inaugurated to serve his second presidential term, Rep.
- ▪“Mount Rushmore, a timeless symbol of our nation’s freedom and strength, deserves to reflect his towering legacy—a legacy further solidified by the powerful start to his second term.”Trump himself has never publicly endorsed the idea, but h
- ▪Many have floated the idea of giving him the Nobel Peace Prize, naming airports after him, and making his birthday a federal holiday.The president is set to give his Fourth of July speech in South Dakota at 8:30 p.m. local time on Friday.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
As President Donald Trump is set to take the stage in front of Mount Rushmore on Friday evening to deliver an Independence Day speech, his White House thinks the monument could include a fifth president.“There would be no better addition to the iconic Mount Rushmore than the 45th and 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump,” White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement to multiple outlets, including ABC News. Recommended Stories Trump signs pardons for 11 people, most convicted of vehicle emissions violations Vance and Melania rake in millions from documentary, books, and NFTs Trump tells Usha Vance he needs to be ‘careful’ he doesn’t become heaviest US president This is not the first time Republicans have floated this idea.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
