When a ‘fake’ Monet turns out to be the real deal: What we really value about art
A recent social media experiment revealed that a real Monet painting was mistaken for an AI-generated image. This incident highlights the confusion surrounding the value of art in the age of artificial intelligence. Despite studies showing that people often prefer AI art, they exhibit a strong bias against it once they learn its origin.
- ▪An image of a Monet painting was posted online, prompting viewers to critique it as if it were AI-generated.
- ▪The painting was actually a genuine Monet, illustrating the public's misunderstanding of art's value.
- ▪Research indicates that people struggle to differentiate between AI-generated and human-created art.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","dateModified":"2026-05-24T03:30:00Z","datePublished":"2026-05-24T03:30:00Z","description":"So, humans can’t pick an AI-generated painting from a master’s. That doesn’t devalue the masterpiece.","headline":"When a ‘fake’ Monet turns out to be the real deal: What we really value about art","keywords":"AI, Opinion, For subscribers, Claude Monet, Jackson Pollock, Spotify","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Will Bennett","jobTitle":"Freelance…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Sydney Morning Herald.