WeSearch

What the Voting Rights Act Decision Means, and Hegseth’s Heated Testimony

https://www.nytimes.com/by/tracy-mumford· ·20 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 3 views
What the Voting Rights Act Decision Means, and Hegseth’s Heated Testimony

Plus, chatbots told scientists how to make bioweapons.

Original article
NYT — Home · https://www.nytimes.com/by/tracy-mumford
Read full at NYT — Home →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

transcriptBack to The Headlinesbars0:00/8:59-8:59transcriptWhat the Voting Rights Act Decision Means, and Hegseth’s Heated TestimonyPlus, chatbots told scientists how to make bioweapons.2026-04-30T06:00:08-04:00This transcript was created using speech recognition software. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email [email protected] with any questions.tracy mumfordFrom “The New York Times,” it’s “The Headlines.” I’m Tracy Mumford. Today’s Thursday, April 30. Here’s what we’re covering.senator chuck schumerThe consequence of this decision is as clear as it is dangerous.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at NYT — Home.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from NYT — Home