What If You Start Calling Yourself Jane Smith, and Sue as Jane Smith, Instead of Asking to Sue Under a Pseudonym?
The article discusses the legal implications of suing under a name that is not one's official name. It highlights a recent court case where a plaintiff was allowed to proceed under the name 'Jane Smith' despite previously using a pseudonym. The court's decision reflects the complexities surrounding name changes and pseudonymous litigation in the legal system.
- ▪Suing under a pseudonym can protect plaintiffs from potential retaliation.
- ▪A recent court ruling allowed a plaintiff to proceed under the name 'Jane Smith' without a formal name change.
- ▪The court emphasized that all trial documents must reflect the plaintiff's real name.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Free Speech What If You Start Calling Yourself Jane Smith, and Sue as Jane Smith, Instead of Asking to Sue Under a Pseudonym? Eugene Volokh | 6.1.2026 8:32 AM Suing under a pseudonym can often be quite valuable to a plaintiff; for instance, someone suing over alleged mistreatment by an employer may worry about becoming known as a litigious employee, and might therefore prefer to sue as a Jane Doe. But there's a strong presumption in our legal system against such pseudonymous litigation, and worry about professional or economic retaliation generally isn't enough to rebut that presumption.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Reason.com
