What did gemma see? - Thinking in comments...
The article discusses the performance of the local model gemma4:26b on the HumanEval benchmark. It highlights that gemma4:26b was the first model to successfully solve the challenging HumanEval/145 problem, achieving a perfect score. The author reflects on the implications of how models interpret problem statements and the nuances involved in sorting algorithms.
- ▪Gemma4:26b was the first local model to pass the HumanEval/145 question.
- ▪It achieved a perfect score of 164/164, outperforming other models.
- ▪The article examines the complexities of how models interpret problem statements, particularly in sorting algorithms.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3852885) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Chris Kilner Posted on May 20 What did gemma see? - Thinking in comments... #devchallenge #gemmachallenge #gemma Gemma 4 Challenge: Write about Gemma 4 Submission This is a submission for the Gemma 4 Challenge: Write About Gemma 4 While running a simple harness around the HumanEval benchmark problems as test of local models, I was surprised to see gemma4:26b to be the first local model to pass the controversial HumanEval/145 question.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
