Viral fearmongering after Supreme Court rules on racial gerrymandering
The Supreme Court recently ruled on a complex case involving racial gerrymandering, clarifying that while intentional racial discrimination in elections remains unconstitutional, gerrymandering based on political motives that affect racial voting blocs may be permissible. The decision also found that creating districts to increase Black representation solely on racial grounds constitutes unconstitutional racial discrimination. Online reactions have included widespread misinformation, with some falsely claiming the ruling reinstates Jim Crow or slavery, contributing to heightened political tensions.
- ▪The Supreme Court affirmed that intentional racial discrimination in elections is still unconstitutional.
- ▪The ruling states that gerrymandering with political motivations, even if it affects racial voting blocs, is not inherently unconstitutional.
- ▪The Court also ruled that drawing districts to increase Black representation based on race alone is unconstitutional racial discrimination.
- ▪Some online influencers spread false claims, including that Jim Crow or slavery has been reinstated.
- ▪The decision may reduce the number of Black members in the House due to partisan gerrymandering, as most Black representatives are Democrats.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
After the third assassination attempt against the president — who, for his part, calls his political opponents ‘traitors’ and demands their hanging — cooler heads are finally prevailing and taking the rhetorical temperature of our political discourse down. Just kidding. Recommended Stories May Day: Chicago’s classroom coup Universities churn out bloodthirsty liberal activists. Case in point: Cole Allen Why are Democrats palling around with anti-American Hasan Piker? In the aftermath of a controversial Supreme Court ruling on race, gerrymandering, and the Civil Rights Act, rampant fearmongering, vile invective, and outright misinformation about the complex case are all going viral.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Washington Examiner.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Washington Examiner
