US supreme court dismisses Alabama’s bid to execute intellectually disabled man
The US Supreme Court has dismissed Alabama's challenge regarding the execution of an intellectually disabled inmate. This decision upholds a lower court's ruling that Joseph Clifton Smith is ineligible for the death penalty due to his intellectual disability. The ruling emphasizes the complexities of assessing IQ scores and the standards for determining intellectual capacity in death penalty cases.
- ▪The Supreme Court dismissed Alabama's petition for review in the case of Hamm v Smith.
- ▪Joseph Clifton Smith was convicted of murder in 1997 and deemed intellectually disabled.
- ▪The ruling prevents Alabama from executing Smith under the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Alabama's lethal injection chamber in Atmore. Photograph: Dave Martin/APView image in fullscreenAlabama's lethal injection chamber in Atmore. Photograph: Dave Martin/APUS supreme court US supreme court dismisses Alabama’s bid to execute intellectually disabled manCourt throws out state’s challenge to judicial finding that inmate convicted of murder is ineligible for death penaltyLucy CampbellThu 21 May 2026 13.54 EDTLast modified on Thu 21 May 2026 13.55 EDTSharePrefer the Guardian on GoogleThe US supreme court on Thursday threw out a challenge by the state of Alabama to a judicial finding that a death row inmate convicted of a 1997 murder is intellectually disabled and thus ineligible under the US constitution for the death penalty.In this highly unusual move, and in a single-sentence,…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Guardian — US.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Guardian — US
