UK on ‘high alert’ to defend Falklands, says RAF chief
The RAF is on 'high alert' to defend the Falkland Islands following a leaked Pentagon email suggesting the US might reconsider its support for UK sovereignty. RAF Chief Air Marshal Sir Harv Smyth emphasized the UK's unwavering commitment to defending the territory. Tensions have been heightened by recent statements from Argentine officials reaffirming their sovereignty claim.
- ▪A leaked Pentagon email raised concerns that the US might review its support for UK control of the Falkland Islands.
- ▪RAF Chief Air Marshal Sir Harv Smyth stated the RAF's role in defending the islands is 'non-negotiable' and that forces are ready to act at a moment’s notice.
- ▪Argentine President Javier Milei and Vice President Victoria Villarruel have publicly asserted Argentina’s claim over the islands, known locally as Las Malvinas.
- ▪The Falkland Islands have been under British administration since 1833 but are claimed by Argentina.
- ▪The UK currently maintains a military presence in the Falklands, including fighter aircraft, as a deterrent since the 1982 conflict.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
NewsUKHome NewsUK on ‘high alert’ to defend Falklands, says RAF chiefA leaked Pentagon email has sparked concerns that the US could back Argentina’s sovereignty claim Harriette Boucher Friday 01 May 2026 23:45 BSTBookmarkCommentsGo to commentsBookmark popoverRemoved from bookmarksClose popover{"translations":{"comments":"Go to comments","share":"Share","copyLink":"Copy link","bookmark":"Bookmark","removeBookmark":"Remove bookmark"},"showComments":true,"showBookmark":true,"articleId":"b2969215","articleMeta":{"url":"https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/raf-falkland-islands-defence-trump-b2969215.html","title":"UK on ‘high alert’ to defend Falklands, says RAF chief"}}open image in gallery{"id":"trigger-autogallery-101956","index":0}Sir Harv Smyth said the UK’s role in defending…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Independent.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Independent
