UCLA, Rose Bowl Trade Barbs in Court
The ongoing legal dispute between UCLA and the Rose Bowl has escalated in court. During a recent hearing, both parties expressed their frustrations over the case, which centers on a lease agreement requiring UCLA to play home games at the Rose Bowl until 2043. The judge is currently deliberating on UCLA's motion to dismiss the lawsuit based on anti-SLAPP arguments.
- ▪UCLA and the Rose Bowl are engaged in a legal battle over a lease agreement.
- ▪The Rose Bowl's attorney described the case as a simple breach-of-contract issue.
- ▪UCLA is attempting to dismiss the lawsuit using anti-SLAPP arguments.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","mainEntityOfPage":"https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/ucla-rose-bowl-trade-barbs-224149123.html","headline":"UCLA, Rose Bowl Trade Barbs in Court","datePublished":"2026-05-22T22:41:49.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-22T22:41:49.000Z","keywords":["Los Angeles Superior Court","Rose Bowl","UCLA","Nima Mohebbi","Oregon Ducks","Wisconsin Badgers"],"description":"The legal battle between UCLA and the Rose Bowl is still ongoing. In a proceeding on Tuesday, both sides expressed their frustrations in a string of heated...","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Yahoo…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Yahoo Sports.