Two-state Israel-Palestine solution is Washington’s empty liturgy
The two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is increasingly viewed as an outdated diplomatic mantra rather than a viable policy. Despite ongoing declarations of support for this framework, the reality on the ground has shifted significantly against it over the past three decades. Both Israeli and Palestinian leaderships face challenges that make the prospect of a negotiated settlement seem increasingly unlikely.
- ▪The two-state solution is often recited by diplomats but lacks grounding in current realities.
- ▪Significant events, such as the growth of Israeli settlements and the weakening of Palestinian governance, undermine the feasibility of partition.
- ▪The political landscape has shifted dramatically since the Oslo Accords, with both sides struggling to find credible negotiating partners.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
When the United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres declares, once again, that “the only way” out of the Israeli-Palestinian impasse runs through two states, one is reminded less of a policy proposal than of a Latin Mass. The words are sacred. They are repeated on schedule. The faithful nod. Whether anyone present believes they describe the world as it is — or as it will be — has long since become beside the point. That is the condition of the two-state solution in 2026: an article of diplomatic faith floating above a reality that has been moving in the opposite direction for 30 years.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Asia Times.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Asia Times
