Trump's no-bond policy for immigrants in custody played out for years in Tacoma, Washington
The Trump administration's no-bond policy for immigrants has faced significant legal challenges, particularly stemming from decisions made by immigration judges in Tacoma, Washington. These judges began denying bond for many immigrants years before the policy was officially adopted, leading to numerous lawsuits alleging constitutional violations. A recent appeals court ruling against the policy sets the stage for a potential Supreme Court showdown.
- ▪Four immigration judges in Tacoma initiated a no-bond policy years before it was adopted by the Trump administration.
- ▪The policy has resulted in tens of thousands of lawsuits alleging violations of constitutional rights.
- ▪An appeals court recently ruled against the Trump administration's no-bond policy, indicating a possible Supreme Court review.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
ABC NewsLiveVideoShowsGood Morning AmericaShopGMAInterest Successfully AddedWe'll notify you here with news aboutTurn on desktop notifications for breaking stories about interest? OffOnStream onTrump's no-bond policy for immigrants in custody played out for years in Tacoma, WashingtonFour immigration judges in Washington state were ahead of a sea change in immigration enforcement that has reversed a long American traditionByCEDAR ATTANASIO Associated PressMay 25, 2026, 11:55 PM1:12Immigrants from Portland, including Victor Cruz, center right, in the gray hooded sweatshirt, embrace family members after being released on bond in Tacoma, Wash., Friday, Nov. 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Cedar Attanasio)The Associated PressTACOMA, Wash.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at ABC News — US.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from ABC News — US
