WeSearch

Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Is Worse Than Stealing

3 sources covered this compare →
Coverage of the proposal varies significantly across outlets. National Review emphasizes the potential for abuse and cronyism, framing the fund as a "boondoggle." In contrast, The Atlantic and Mother Jones focus on the implications of the…
Jonathan Chait· ·5 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 14 views
#politics#trump#insurrection
Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Is Worse Than Stealing
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Donald Trump has established a $1.8 billion fund intended for victims of government weaponization, which critics argue is a means to benefit his allies. The fund is perceived as a way for Trump to reward insurrectionists while avoiding accountability for the January 6 events. Despite assurances from the Justice Department that Trump and his family will not benefit, the fund's management raises concerns about its true purpose.

Key facts
Original article
The Atlantic · Jonathan Chait
Read full at The Atlantic →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

IdeasTrump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Is Worse Than StealingRecasting the January 6 insurrection as the work of heroic patriots remains the president’s highest priority.By Jonathan ChaitIllustration by The Atlantic. Source: Jon Cherry / Getty; kampee patisena / Getty; Matt Anderson Photography / Getty.May 19, 2026, 9:13 AM ET ShareSave Among the very first things Donald Trump did upon assuming the powers of the presidency for the second time was commute the sentences of, and grant pardons to, everybody involved in his attempt to overturn the 2020 election. Republican allies expressed moderate disappointment but vowed to move past this ugly blemish.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Atlantic.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from The Atlantic