The Supreme Court Stands Up for Girls in Sports
PoliticsNo description available.FOLLOW TOPIC --:----:--Upgrade to ListenProduced by ElevenLabs using AI narrationREAD IN APPAfter the Supreme Court heard arguments in West Virginia v. Hecox, earlier this year, it looked like the challenges to West Virginia’s and Idaho’s laws prohibiting biological males from playing girls’ and women’s sports would fail. Tuesday’s ruling confirms why: Sex categories in sports exist for a reason, and neither the Constitution nor federal law requires schools to pretend otherwise.Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s majority opinion gets the central point right.
- ▪PoliticsNo description available.FOLLOW TOPIC --:----:--Upgrade to ListenProduced by ElevenLabs using AI narrationREAD IN APPAfter the Supreme Court heard arguments in West Virginia v.
- ▪Hecox, earlier this year, it looked like the challenges to West Virginia’s and Idaho’s laws prohibiting biological males from playing girls’ and women’s sports would fail.
- ▪Tuesday’s ruling confirms why: Sex categories in sports exist for a reason, and neither the Constitution nor federal law requires schools to pretend otherwise.Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s majority opinion gets the central point right.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The Supreme Court Stands Up for Girls in SportsA man protests outside the Supreme Court as justices hear arguments in challenges to state bans on transgender athletes in female sports on January 13, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Oliver Contreras / AFP via Getty Images)Tuesday’s ruling is a victory for fairness, reality, and the girls whom Title IX was meant to protect.By Ilya Shapiro06.30.26 — U.S. PoliticsNo description available.FOLLOW TOPIC --:----:--Upgrade to ListenProduced by ElevenLabs using AI narrationREAD IN APPAfter the Supreme Court heard arguments in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and the companion case, Little v.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Free Press.