The Supreme Court Just Transformed Its Horrible Voting Rights Ruling Into Something More Calamitous
The Supreme Court has issued a ruling that significantly impacts voting rights in Alabama, favoring a map that dilutes Black political representation. This decision has been criticized for perpetuating racial discrimination in electoral processes. The ruling is seen as a major shift in the interpretation of the Voting Rights Act, undermining protections against racially discriminatory redistricting.
- ▪The Supreme Court's recent ruling reinstates a controversial electoral map in Alabama that has been deemed unlawful for racial discrimination.
- ▪The decision was made by the court's conservative supermajority, over the dissent of the three liberal justices.
- ▪Justice Sonia Sotomayor described the court's intervention as 'unconscionable,' disregarding democratic values and the rule of law.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Jurisprudence The Supreme Court Just Transformed Its Horrible Voting Rights Ruling Into Something More Calamitous By Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern June 03, 202610:42 AM Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images Copy Link Share Share Comment Copy Link Share Share Comment On Tuesday evening, in an unsigned shadow docket order, the Supreme Court awarded Alabama a massive victory in its longrunning campaign to crush Black residents’ political representation.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Slate.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Slate
