The phrase "taste is the differentiator" is not beneficial
The article critiques the phrase "taste is the differentiator" in the context of AI advancements. It argues that repeating this phrase is a misguided response to the evolving capabilities of AI. Instead of focusing on perceived shortcomings, the author encourages embracing AI's strengths and delegating tasks where it excels.
- ▪The phrase "taste is the differentiator" is seen as a fool's trap in the context of AI.
- ▪Critiques of AI have evolved over the years, with each year presenting a new concern.
- ▪The author suggests that instead of focusing on AI's limitations, one should consider where AI can outperform human judgment.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
2026-05-23 Repeating the phrase “taste is the differentiator” will not benefit you AI has a new fool’s trap each year. In 2022, the critique was that it was just a glorified autocomplete. In 2023, that it hallucinated too much. In 2024 and 2025, that LLMs weren’t truly intelligent, just stochastic parrots. This year, the year of the Lord 2026, the fool’s trap is: “AI lacks human judgment, taste is the differentiator”. Don’t buy into this year’s fool’s trap. As Nadia Asparouhova wrote in The tyranny of ideas, “Ideas ride us into battle like warhorses.” The people who repeated the previous critiques were tyrannized by their ideas of incompetent AI and rode to war with a foolish strategy. In hindsight, it was cope. Some criticism was warranted, but it was cope nonetheless.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at hazn.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from hazn
