The mirage of Israel-Lebanon rapprochement
Recent talks between Israeli and Lebanese officials mark the first direct negotiations in decades, aiming for a peace agreement and disarming Hezbollah. However, historical precedents, such as the failed May 17 Agreement of 1983, cast doubt on the potential for success. The Lebanese government's inability to fully control its territory and military decisions remains a significant obstacle to any lasting arrangement.
- ▪Israel and Lebanon have announced the opening of direct negotiations for the first time since 1983.
- ▪The Lebanese Armed Forces have struggled to assert control, as evidenced by Hezbollah's continued strikes against Israel.
- ▪The current Lebanese government has adopted a reformist platform aimed at disarming non-state actors, including Hezbollah.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Those of us who have spent years chronicling the long, tragicomic history of American diplomacy in the Middle East could be forgiven a certain weary déjà vu watching Secretary of State Marco Rubio convene Israeli and Lebanese officials at the State Department in April. The optics were arresting — the first direct Israel-Lebanon talks in decades, hosted in Washington — and the atmospherics, as always in such affairs, were carefully managed. Optimism was performed. Expectations were dutifully “tempered.” History, as usual, was not invited to the room. And yet history has a way of showing up uninvited.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Asia Times.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Asia Times
