The Fallacy of Digital Platforms: Why Stripe Isn't Always King
The article discusses the limitations of relying solely on digital payment platforms like Stripe. It highlights the benefits of integrating local payment processors to enhance customer experience. The author reflects on their decision to switch from Stripe to a combination of local gateways, resulting in improved processing times and increased sales.
- ▪Stripe and PayPal are not available in every country, making local payment gateways a better option.
- ▪Abandoning reliance on Stripe led to a 30% decrease in pipeline latency and a 20% reduction in query costs.
- ▪Customer satisfaction increased significantly, with a 40% rise in sales from previously unreachable regions.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3942568) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } ruth mhlanga Posted on May 21 The Fallacy of Digital Platforms: Why Stripe Isn't Always King #webdev #programming #dataengineering #python The Problem We Were Actually Solving Our primary goal was to create a seamless purchasing experience for customers worldwide. With Stripe's reputation for ease of use and reliability, we thought it was the best choice for handling all our transactions.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
