The cognitive bottleneck: rethinking velocity for AI-assisted development
The article discusses the shift from traditional coding to agentic coding in software development. It highlights how this transition changes the developer's role to that of an orchestrator and reviewer, impacting velocity estimations. The focus now shifts from implementation speed to the cognitive complexity involved in reviewing AI-generated code.
- ▪Moving to agentic coding requires developers to adopt new roles as orchestrators and reviewers.
- ▪Traditional agile velocity estimations are no longer applicable as the time to write code becomes less significant.
- ▪The cognitive capacity to review AI-generated code has become the primary bottleneck in the development process.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 1040000) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Lawrence Cooke Posted on May 24 The cognitive bottleneck: rethinking velocity for AI-assisted development #development #webdev #management Moving from traditional coding to agentic coding requires a large mindset shift. As a developer, your job transitions into an orchestrator and reviewer role. You design the ticket, hand it off to an agent like Claude Code to implement, review what was done, and request changes.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).