The anti-weaponization fund is not just for J6. It is for the rest of us too.
The article discusses the implications of the anti-weaponization fund beyond the January 6 events. It highlights concerns regarding civil liberties and the potential misuse of government power. The author argues that this fund is essential for protecting citizens from lawfare and overreach by authorities.
- ▪The anti-weaponization fund aims to protect civil liberties.
- ▪It addresses concerns about government overreach and lawfare.
- ▪The fund is not limited to the events of January 6, but has broader implications for all citizens.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
JDawnInk/Getty Images {"customDimensions": {"2":"Amy Sterner Nelson","8":"opinion \u0026 analysis, weaponization, lawfare, january 6, civil liberties, department of justice, todd blanche, donald trump, fbi, fraud, asset forfeiture, amazon, netflix, irs","11":"opinion \u0026 analysis","7":"opinion","10":"05/22/2026"}, "post": {"id": 2676927662, "providerId": 0, "sections": [0, 2229864441, 545193419, 32156549], "authors": [26878984], "tags": ["opinion \u0026 analysis", "weaponization", "lawfare", "january 6", "civil liberties", "department of justice", "todd blanche", "donald trump", "fbi", "fraud", "asset forfeiture", "amazon", "netflix", "irs"], "streams": [], "split_testing": {}} }
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Blaze.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Blaze
