The 1996 Everest disaster and our eternal contempt for the wealthy
In May 1996 a storm on Mount Everest caused the deaths of eight guides, Sherpas, and clients, a tragedy later recounted in Jon Krakauer’s book "Into Thin Air." The book singled out wealthy climber Sandy Hill as a figure whose presence allegedly diverted Sherpa assistance, leading to widespread criticism of her and broader resentment toward affluent adventurers. The article uses the anniversary to discuss how the disaster has been linked to enduring cultural contempt for the super‑rich and the growth of high‑cost guided expeditions.
- ▪Eight people, including guides and Sherpas, died on Everest in 1996 after a severe storm and late‑day summit attempts.
- ▪Jon Krakauer’s "Into Thin Air" portrayed Sandy Hill as a "millionaire socialite‑cum‑climber," suggesting her status affected Sherpa resources.
- ▪Hill reported personal and professional fallout, including loss of employment and strained family relationships.
- ▪Since the disaster, guided climbs have surged, with wealthy clients paying upwards of $120,000 for premium experiences.
- ▪The piece connects the incident to broader societal disdain for the wealthy, citing examples like billionaire Hamish Harding’s death and political rhetoric targeting the rich.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Opinion>Opinions - Campaign The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill The 1996 Everest disaster and our eternal contempt for the wealthy Comments: by Greg Wallance, opinion contributor - 05/19/26 1:00 PM ET Comments: Link copied by Greg Wallance, opinion contributor - 05/19/26 1:00 PM ET Comments: Link copied AP Photo/Pasang Rinzee Sherpa In mid-May 1996, eight climbing guides, Sherpas, and their paying clients lost their lives on Mount Everest. A brutal storm contributed to the tragedy, as did the guides’ decision to continue to the summit too late in the day.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Hill.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Hill
