Supreme Court Rebukes Effort To Force Race-Based House Map On Deep Red State
The Supreme Court has ruled in favor of Alabama's redrawn House map, allowing the state to gain an additional Republican seat. This decision overturned a lower court's ruling that deemed the map as racially discriminatory. The Court's ruling was based on a previous decision that weakened provisions of the Voting Rights Act.
- ▪The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling allows Alabama to use a redrawn House map that favors Republicans.
- ▪A lower court had previously blocked the map, citing race-based discrimination.
- ▪The Supreme Court referenced its earlier ruling in Louisiana v. Callais to support its decision.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
US Supreme Court Rebukes Effort To Force Race-Based House Map On Deep Red State Faith Miller Contributor June 03, 2026 10:45 AM ET June 03, 2026 10:45 AM ET Faith Miller Contributor Font Size: const observer = new MutationObserver((mutations) => { const adDivToHide = document.querySelector("#dailycaller_incontent_1"); if (adDivToHide && dc_noads_page) { adDivToHide.classList.add("hide-premium", "hide-free"); observer.disconnect(); console.log("Ad div found and hidden"); } }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday to allow Alabama to use a redrawn House map that gives Republicans one additional seat after a lower court previously blocked it. The Supreme Court based its unsigned 6-3 ruling on April’s Louisiana v.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Dailycaller.