Supreme Court Leaves Rulings on Executing the Intellectually Disabled in Place
The US Supreme Court upheld its previous rulings that individuals with intellectual disabilities should not face execution. The decision came in the case of Hamm v. Smith, where the court emphasized that IQ tests alone are insufficient for determining intellectual disability. Dissenting justices raised concerns about the implications of the ruling and the ongoing debates surrounding the death penalty and racial bias.
- ▪The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to dismiss the Hamm v. Smith case, reaffirming that people with intellectual disabilities should not be executed.
- ▪Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted that the court is not equipped to provide guidance on assessing multiple IQ scores.
- ▪The state of Alabama argued that Joseph Clinton Smith could be executed despite his documented intellectual disability.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
freestar.config.enabled_slots.push({ placementName: "motherjones_right_rail_1", slotId: "ROS_ATF_300x600" }); The man at the center of this case, Joseph Clinton Smith, was found to have an intellectual disability while in school.Nevada Department of Corrections/AP Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily. On Thursday, the US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to dismiss the Hamm v. Smith case, effectively upholding its rulings that people with intellectual disabilities should not be executed, and that IQ tests alone are not enough to determine whether someone has an intellectual disability.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Mother Jones.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Mother Jones
