Spinal Anesthesia for Circumcision Tops General Anesthesia
A recent study presented at the AUA 2026 Annual Meeting found that spinal anesthesia for pediatric circumcision is a safe and cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia. The research analyzed over 600 cases and showed that spinal anesthesia resulted in faster recovery times and significantly less opioid use. Despite its benefits, many pediatric urologists remain hesitant to adopt spinal anesthesia due to unfamiliarity and concerns about procedure duration.
- ▪Spinal anesthesia was associated with faster recovery and less opioid use compared to general anesthesia.
- ▪The study reviewed 614 pediatric circumcision cases over seven years at Maine Medical Center.
- ▪Spinal anesthesia cases had similar operating room times and lower supply costs than general anesthesia.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Spinal anesthesia for circumcision was associated with faster recovery, similar operating room (OR) time, and significantly less opioid and general medication use with no increase in cost compared with general anesthesia for children up to 12 months, according to new data presented at the American Urological Association (AUA) 2026 Annual Meeting.“These findings support SA [spinal anesthesia] as a safe, efficient, and cost-effective alternative to GA [general anesthesia] for pediatric circumcision,” wrote the authors of the abstract.Data on 600-Plus Patients Spanned 7 YearsResearchers with Maine Medical Center Urology reviewed pediatric circumcisions performed at their institution from 2018 to 2025 in patients eligible for either spinal anesthesia or general anesthesia.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Medscape.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Medscape
