Soft on Crime
The article critiques Jared Polis' decision to show mercy to Tina Peters, labeling it as indefensible. It reflects on the implications of such actions in the context of political accountability. The author expresses frustration over the lack of serious consequences for individuals involved in controversial actions.
- ▪Jared Polis' act of mercy towards Tina Peters is criticized as indefensible.
- ▪The article discusses the broader implications of political accountability.
- ▪The author reflects on previous comments made regarding a $2 billion-dollar slush fund.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Boiling Frogs Soft on Crime Jared Polis’ act of mercy to Tina Peters is indefensible. Nick Catoggio / May 19, 2026 Loading Illustration by Noah Hickey/The Dispatch (Photos via Getty Images). Illustration by Noah Hickey/The Dispatch (Photos via Getty Images). Audio Turn any article into a podcast. Upgrade now to start listening. Text Size Members can share articles with friends & family to bypass the paywall. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Threads Email 0 Open and scroll to the comments section You’re reading Boiling Frogs, Nick Catoggio’s daily newsletter on politics. To unlock the full version, become a Dispatch member today. Most of what I had to say about the president’s preposterous $2 billion-dollar slush fund was said in Friday’s newsletter.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Dispatch.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Dispatch
