WeSearch

Sergey Brin fights fire with fire — and two ballot initiatives

·4 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 8 views
#taxes#california#billionaires#politics#ballot initiatives#Sergey Brin#Google#California#SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West#Building a Better California#Gavin Newsom#Sacramento#New York Post
Sergey Brin fights fire with fire — and two ballot initiatives
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Sergey Brin, Google co-founder, has funded two ballot initiatives in California to counter a proposed 'billionaire tax' that would retroactively tax wealth. One initiative would ban taxes on personal property, while the other mandates audits and restricts tax revenue to be spent on education. Brin, who left California after the tax proposal, argues these measures defend the 'California Dream' of innovation and individual freedom.

Key facts
Original article
Opinion – Latest Op-Eds & News Commentary | New York Post
Read full at Opinion – Latest Op-Eds & News Commentary | New York Post →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Opinion Sergei Brin fights fire with fire — and two ballot initiatives By CA Post Editorial Board Published May 1, 2026, 8:12 p.m. ET The billionaire tax is on the ballot — but so are the weapons against it. Google founder Sergey Brin has launched — and largely funded — two ballot initiatives that take direct aim at the tax proposal. One of Brin’s countermeasures would ban taxes on personal property, including retroactive taxes. (The billionaire tax proposes seizing 5% of the wealth and assets of its targets). If it receives more votes than the billionaire tax, then under state law, it would prevail. The other countermeasure would require audits of new taxes, and would require the proceeds from the billionaire tax to be spent on education — not on health care.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Opinion – Latest Op-Eds & News Commentary | New York Post.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments