WeSearch

Senior SWE-Bench: open-source benchmark that assesses agents as senior engineers

·6 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 33 views
#senior#swe-bench#open-source#benchmark#assesses
Senior SWE-Bench: open-source benchmark that assesses agents as senior engineers
TL;DR · WeSearch summary

Senior SWE-BenchWe treat agents like senior engineers, so why evaluate them like junior engineers?01Senior engineers build features without over-specified requirementsSenior SWE-Bench feature tasks have realistic instructions that read like natural language messages rather than over-specified requirements. This presents a problem when metadata is missing, malformed, or incomplete—particularly for books with only ISBN-13s. As a result, incomplete records submitted via promise items or `/api/import` may fail to be enriched, leaving poor-quality entries in Open Library.

Key facts
Original article
Senior SWE-Bench
Read full at Senior SWE-Bench →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

Senior SWE-BenchWe treat agents like senior engineers, so why evaluate them like junior engineers?01Senior engineers build features without over-specified requirementsSenior SWE-Bench feature tasks have realistic instructions that read like natural language messages rather than over-specified requirements. To reliably evaluate these tasks, we introduce a validation agent which uses expert-designed recipes to write behavioral tests that adapt to submitted solutions.02Senior engineers solve bugs that require runtime investigation from behavioral reportsSenior SWE-Bench bug tasks reflect tricky user reports and focus on investigation, from starting services to debugging subtle runtime issues. They are sourced from PRs that needed significant runtime investigation to solve (e.g.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Senior SWE-Bench.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from Senior SWE-Bench