‘Save KBR’ campaign volunteers question relevance of flyovers
The 'Save KBR' campaign is raising concerns about the government's plans to cut down trees for flyover construction near KBR National Park. Activists argue that flyovers do not effectively reduce traffic congestion and question the government's commitment to environmental preservation. They advocate for investment in public transport instead of expanding road infrastructure.
- ▪The campaign questions the relevance of flyovers for urban commuting and the government's road transport policy.
- ▪Activists claim the government has not provided necessary documentation for public hearings regarding tree felling.
- ▪Experts argue that flyovers worsen congestion and advocate for alternative solutions like improved public transport.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Questions covering a wide range of topics including erasure of green cover in the city, road transport policy of the government, and relevance of flyovers for urban commute were raised at the media conference addressed by the citizens and activists who are part of the ‘Save KBR’ campaign launched against the tree felling around the KBR National Park for construction of flyovers and underpasses.The meet was organised following the Supreme Court’s stay against tree felling in the vicinity of the park. One of the petitioners, Kaajal Maheshwari, explained that the government failed to produce documents authenticating public hearing, which invalidates the eco sensitive zone fixed around the park.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Hindu — Top.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Hindu — Top
