Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work
ArXiv is implementing stricter measures against the misuse of AI in research submissions. Authors who submit papers that show clear evidence of not verifying AI-generated content will face a one-year ban from the platform. This initiative aims to ensure accountability and maintain the quality of research shared on the site.
- ▪ArXiv will ban authors for one year if they fail to verify AI-generated content in their submissions.
- ▪The organization is transitioning to an independent nonprofit to better address issues related to AI misuse.
- ▪Authors are still responsible for any inappropriate or misleading content generated by AI, including fabricated citations.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
ArXiv, a widely used open repository for preprint research, is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers. Although papers are posted to the site before they are peer-reviewed, arXiv (pronounced “archive”) has become one of the main ways that research circulates in fields like computer science and math, and the site itself has become a source of data on trends in scientific research. ArXiv has already taken steps to combat a growing number of low-quality, AI-generated papers, for example by requiring first-time posters to get an endorsement from an established author.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at TechCrunch.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from TechCrunch
