Prediction markets are fueling a high-stakes brawl between states and federal regulators
A legal battle is unfolding between states and the CFTC over the regulation of prediction markets. States argue that these platforms are operating illegal sports betting, while the CFTC asserts its authority to regulate event contracts. The outcome of these disputes may ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court due to conflicting rulings from different jurisdictions.
- ▪States claim that prediction market platforms are conducting illegal sports betting operations.
- ▪The CFTC argues that it has the authority to regulate all event contracts under federal law.
- ▪A preliminary injunction was granted in Arizona to prevent the state from pursuing charges against Kalshi, a major prediction market platform.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
"Like red states and blue states alike, AG Mayes believes the CFTC is improperly encroaching on the right of states to enforce their gambling laws," Taylor said. The battle for oversight of events contractsA spokesperson for the CFTC denied that there's anything involved in the commission's legal strategy beyond a pursuit to defend its regulatory power. "These states sought to regulate or prosecute lawful, CFTC‑regulated exchanges that were operating fully in accordance with federal statutes, requiring the CFTC to intervene," an agency spokesperson said in a statement.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at CNBC — Top.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from CNBC — Top
