"Plaintiff Was Enticed by an Attractive, Busty Jewess, and Wet His Mouth with a Drink of Partially Unknown Provenance"
A plaintiff in a case against the University of Pennsylvania has been denied pseudonymity due to the speculative nature of his claims regarding potential harm. The court emphasized that the presumption is in favor of public disclosure in judicial proceedings. This ruling follows a similar decision in a previous case involving the same plaintiff against Harvard University.
- ▪The plaintiff claims he was poisoned and has made controversial statements about Jews.
- ▪The court ruled that the plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to warrant pseudonymity.
- ▪This case follows a previous ruling where the same plaintiff was denied pseudonymity in a lawsuit against Harvard.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Free Speech "Plaintiff Was Enticed by an Attractive, Busty Jewess, and Wet His Mouth with a Drink of Partially Unknown Provenance" "Plaintiff suspects he was poisoned by Jews." Eugene Volokh | 5.20.2026 8:33 AM <img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-8382678 aligncenter" src="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2026/05/AttractiveBustyJewess.jpg" alt="" width="614" height="180" srcset="https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2026/05/AttractiveBustyJewess.jpg 614w, https://d2eehagpk5cl65.cloudfront.net/img/q60/uploads/2026/05/AttractiveBustyJewess-300x88.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 614px) 100vw, 614px" /> That's from plaintiff's follow-up arguments for pseudonymity filed Saturday in Doe v. Trustees of Univ. of Pa. (E.D. Pa.).
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Reason.com
