No, JAMA Didn’t Just Prove That Pro-Life Laws Lead to Worse Miscarriage Care
The authors then attack pro-life states because doctors in these states have not rapidly adopted this off-label use of a drug, mifepristone, with an FDA-approved use that is ordinarily illegal in these states. Meanwhile, none of the three manufacturers of mifepristone—Danco Laboratories, GenBioPro, and Evita Solutions—has ever applied to the FDA to add this secondary use to the drug’s label. Why haven’t they simply applied to change the label?
- ▪The authors then attack pro-life states because doctors in these states have not rapidly adopted this off-label use of a drug, mifepristone, with an FDA-approved use that is ordinarily illegal in these states.
- ▪Meanwhile, none of the three manufacturers of mifepristone—Danco Laboratories, GenBioPro, and Evita Solutions—has ever applied to the FDA to add this secondary use to the drug’s label.
- ▪Why haven’t they simply applied to change the label?
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Home – Mifepristone News – No, JAMA Didn’t Just Prove That Pro-Life Laws Lead to Worse Miscarriage Care opinion No, JAMA Didn’t Just Prove That Pro-Life Laws Lead to Worse Miscarriage Care Jamie Bryan Hall • June 23, 2026 Print Protesters holding Planned Parenthood signs in the District of Columbia on November 12, 2025. (Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) (function(){var t=document.querySelector(".wp-block-kadence-dynamichtml"),s=document.currentScript.previousElementSibling;if(t&&s){if("prepend"==="before_element")t.parentNode.insertBefore(s,t);else if("prepend"==="after_element")t.parentNode.insertBefore(s,t.nextSibling);else if("prepend"==="prepend"||"prepend"==="inside_first_child")t.insertBefore(s,t.firstChild);else t.appendChild(s);}})(); The Journal of the American…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Daily Signal.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Daily Signal
