MPs hear how question of pressure is at heart of Mandelson scandal
The testimony regarding Peter Mandelson's appointment as US ambassador revealed conflicting views on the influence of Downing Street. While both former officials acknowledged pressure from No 10, they insisted it did not affect the decision to grant Mandelson security clearance. This consensus, however, raises skepticism about the integrity of the vetting process.
- ▪Philip Barton described Mandelson's connections as a 'toxic hot potato' and noted he was not consulted on the appointment.
- ▪Morgan McSweeney expressed deep concern upon learning about Mandelson's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
- ▪Both witnesses confirmed that while there was pressure from Downing Street, it did not impact the decision to grant security clearance to Mandelson.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Morgan McSweeney, left, and Philip Barton testify to MPs about the decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador. Composite: Parliament TVView image in fullscreenMorgan McSweeney, left, and Philip Barton testify to MPs about the decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador. Composite: Parliament TVPeter MandelsonAnalysisDrop the ‘toxic hot potato’: what Barton and McSweeney really revealed about the Mandelson scandalPaul LewisTestimony from former senior officials that pressure from No 10 did not sway appointment decision strains credulityTue 28 Apr 2026 12.55 EDTLast modified on Mon 11 May 2026 06.09 EDTShareThe latest two witnesses to testify to parliament over Peter Mandelson’s appointment had plenty to offer headline writers.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at The Guardian — World.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from The Guardian — World
