WeSearch

Mike Perry bloodies and beats Nate Diaz on Ronda Rousey-Gina Carano MMA undercard

4 sources covered this ⚠ Right-only compare →
All three Yahoo Sports reports emphasized the graphic nature of Diaz’s injuries and the intervention of his coach, Richard Perez, who stopped the fight between rounds. They framed the outcome around the physical toll on Diaz and the…
·4 min read · 0 reactions · 0 comments · 20 views
#mma#nate diaz#mike perry#ronda rousey#combat sports
Mike Perry bloodies and beats Nate Diaz on Ronda Rousey-Gina Carano MMA undercard
⚡ TL;DR · AI summary

Mike Perry defeated Nate Diaz in a two-round welterweight fight on the undercard of Ronda Rousey's bout against Gina Carano. Perry, returning from a five-year absence from MMA, overwhelmed Diaz with consistent offense, leading to a corner stoppage after the second round. Diaz, a crowd favorite, sustained visible injuries but showed resilience despite the loss.

Key facts
Original article
New York Post
Read full at New York Post →
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand

MMA Mike Perry bloodies and beats Nate Diaz on Ronda Rousey-Gina Carano MMA undercard By Associated Press Published May 17, 2026, 4:34 a.m. ET INGLEWOOD, Calif. — Mike Perry beat Nate Diaz in a two-round welterweight brawl Saturday night on the undercard of Ronda Rousey’s 17-second win over Gina Carano. Perry (15-8) earned his first victory in mixed martial arts since June 2020 with 10 minutes of steady punishment for the 41-year-old Diaz (21-14), who had been away from the MMA cage for nearly four years. Perry was quicker and more active than Diaz, whose face and chest were covered in blood during the second round. Perry threw a flying knee that sent Diaz sprawling at the second-round bell, and referee Mike Beltran waved off the fight moments later in agreement with Diaz’s corner.

Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.

Anonymous · no account needed
Share 𝕏 Facebook Reddit LinkedIn Threads WhatsApp Bluesky Mastodon Email

Discussion

0 comments

More from New York Post