Michigan Dem Senate candidate pushing water affordability agenda racked up unpaid bills on $1.28M home
Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Mallory McMorrow, who advocates for water affordability and has co-sponsored legislation to end water shutoffs, accrued nearly a year of unpaid water and sewer bills on her $1.28 million home. The unpaid balance, totaling $3,000.37 including late fees, was paid after media inquiry. McMorrow, who reported a net worth of up to $1.87 million, has faced repeated late fees on utility payments since purchasing the property in 2021.
- ▪Mallory McMorrow and her husband failed to pay water and sewer charges on their Royal Oak, Michigan home from June 2025 until May 2026, accruing $3,000.37 in bills and late fees.
- ▪The debt was paid shortly after Fox News Digital contacted her spokesperson, who stated the matter had been resolved.
- ▪McMorrow has co-sponsored legislation to cap water bills for low-income residents and end water shutoffs, advocating that access to water is a human right.
- ▪Records show the couple has incurred 10 late fees totaling over $400 since 2021, including a five-month nonpayment period in late 2024.
- ▪McMorrow reported a net worth between $588,041 and $1.87 million, with up to $1.15 million in assets listed under her name or jointly with her husband.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
US News Michigan Dem Senate candidate pushing water affordability agenda racked up unpaid bills on $1.28M home By Adam Pack, Fox News Published May 16, 2026, 4:22 a.m. ET Originally Published by: Georgia GOP hopeful vows DEI ban but his nonprofit urged CEOs to invest in it Soros prosecutor’s hearing devolves into chaos over illegal immigrant rape case Navy veteran seeks to turn Tampa Bay red, unseat 20-year House incumbent Democrat Senate candidate Mallory McMorrow accrued nearly a year’s worth of unpaid utility charges on her million-dollar home while campaigning on affordability.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from New York Post
