Leo XIV Makes Bishop of “Strickland’s Judas” – Priest Instrumental in Removing Bishop Strickland
Pope Leo XIV has appointed Father John Gomez as the new Bishop of Laredo, a decision that has sparked controversy due to Gomez's involvement in the apostolic visitation that led to the removal of Bishop Joseph Strickland. Some critics view the appointment as a continuation of Pope Francis's previous Church leadership approach and question the transparency of the process. Concerns have been raised within the diocese about potential retaliation and the broader tensions between Vatican authorities and traditionalist Catholics.
- ▪Pope Leo XIV appointed Father John Gomez as the Bishop of Laredo.
- ▪Fr. John Gomez played a significant role in the apostolic visitation that contributed to Bishop Joseph Strickland's removal.
- ▪The appointment has drawn criticism from traditionalist Catholics who question the fairness of Strickland's ouster.
- ▪Some see the decision as reflecting continuity with Pope Francis's prior governance of the Church.
- ▪Diocesan sources have expressed concerns about transparency and possible retaliation following the appointment.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Back — Video Topics | Pro-life | Pro-family | Catholic Church | Freedom Leo XIV Makes Bishop of “Strickland’s Judas” - Priest Instrumental in Removing Bishop Strickland Breaking News See More Pope Leo XIV appoints Fr. John Gomez as Bishop of Laredo, igniting controversy tied to the removal of Joseph Strickland. Gomez played a key role during an apostolic visitation that led to Strickland’s ouster, raising questions about the fairness of the process. The appointment is seen by some as continuity with the prior Vatican leadership and decision-making of Pope Francis. Sources within the diocese express concern over transparency and fear of retaliation, as the move underscores ongoing tensions between Church authorities and traditionalist Catholics.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at LifeSiteNews.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from LifeSiteNews
