Lambda Execution Roles Are Quietly Breaking Your Least Privilege Policy
AWS Lambda execution roles are often set up in a way that violates the principle of least privilege, leading to potential security risks. Many developers add excessive permissions to roles or reuse the same role across multiple functions, which can expose sensitive data and resources. This article highlights the importance of properly configuring execution roles to enhance security in serverless applications.
- ▪Lambda functions require IAM execution roles to interact with AWS services.
- ▪The principle of least privilege dictates that functions should only have the minimum permissions necessary.
- ▪Common mistakes include using wildcard permissions and sharing roles across multiple functions.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3901526) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Tanseer for AWS Community Builders Posted on May 21 Lambda Execution Roles Are Quietly Breaking Your Least Privilege Policy #aws #serverless #security #lambda Who This Is For If you are using AWS Lambda to build serverless applications and you have never stopped to look closely at the IAM roles attached to your functions, this blog is for you.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
