Kristof’s libelous Israel smears: Letters to the Editor — May 18, 2026
Nicholas Kristof's recent column in The New York Times has sparked controversy due to its claims about Israel's treatment of Palestinian prisoners. Critics argue that the article is inflammatory and unverified, reflecting a bias in the publication's reporting. The backlash highlights ongoing tensions surrounding media portrayals of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
- ▪Nicholas Kristof claimed that Israel uses dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners in his New York Times column.
- ▪Critics have accused The New York Times of publishing unconfirmed and inflammatory content that serves partisan agendas.
- ▪The article has drawn attention to the perceived inconsistency in media coverage of Israeli actions compared to those of Hamas.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Opinion letters to the editor Kristof’s libelous Israel smears: Letters to the Editor — May 18, 2026 By Post readers Published May 17, 2026, 6:33 p.m. ET New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof claimed that Israel uses dogs.to rape Palestinian prisoners. Getty Images for Concordia Summit The Issue: Nicholas Kristof’s New York Times column claiming that the IDF trains dogs to rape prisoners. It’s shocking — though not surprising — that The New York Times would publish such an unconfirmed and inflammatory article (“ ‘Mounting’ shame of Nicholas Kristof,” Douglas Murray, May 15). A newspaper once guided by the motto “All the News That’s Fit to Print” now appears to be serving partisan political agendas.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at New York Post.