Judge's Conclusions About Risks of Identification for ICE Officers
A judge's conclusions in the case of U.S. v. Virginia highlight the risks of identification for ICE officers, including threats of targeted harassment and retaliation. The court's analysis considered the increasing commonality of threats against federal immigration officers, including doxxing and intimidation. The judge's decision was influenced by evidence of credible intelligence showing that Mexican criminals and domestic extremist groups have placed targeted bounties for the murders of ICE and CBP personnel.
- ▪Individuals routinely photograph and publish online ICE ERO enforcement actions, including the personal identities of ICE officers, to intimidate and harass them.
- ▪There is credible intelligence showing that Mexican criminals and domestic extremist groups have placed targeted bounties for the murders of ICE and CBP personnel.
- ▪The bounty system includes payouts for gathering intelligence, kidnapping, non-lethal assaults, and assassinations of federal personnel.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Judge's Conclusions About Risks of Identification for ICE Officers Eugene Volokh | 7.3.2026 9:02 PM From U.S. v. Virginia, decided yesterday by Judge Robert Payne (E.D. Va.); these conclusions played a role in the court's "irreparable harm" analysis, one of the factors that the court had to consider in deciding whether to grant a preliminary injunction: The record in this case shows that, with increased enforcement activity and the resistance thereto, there came to be "increasingly common threats of targeted harassment of and retaliation against federal immigration officers for simply doing their jobs." In particular, it is shown by the affidavit of Eric S.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Reason.com.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Reason.com
