Josh Johnsons Daily Show response to SCOTUS Voting Rights Act ruling is a must-watch
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Louisiana's congressional map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, requiring it to be redrawn, in a decision that weakens the Voting Rights Act. The Daily Show's Josh Johnson criticized the ruling, arguing it enables racial discrimination under the guise of legal technicalities. He suggested the decision benefits Republicans and represents a step backward in racial progress.
- ▪The Supreme Court ruled Louisiana's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
- ▪The decision undermines the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which has protected minority voters' electoral influence.
- ▪Josh Johnson argued the ruling effectively allows racism if not explicitly stated.
- ▪Johnson claimed the decision benefits Republicans and reflects a regression in civil rights progress.
- ▪Justice Samuel Alito stated a map is only unconstitutional if there is strong evidence of intentional racial discrimination.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
The U.S. Supreme Court continued its attack on the Voting Rights Act (VRA) on Wednesday, with a ruling on the 1965 civil rights law that will have major implications for racial discrimination. Specifically, the court's conservative majority ruled that Louisiana's congressional map, which has two Black-majority districts, was an "an unconstitutional racial gerrymander" and will be redrawn. The 60-year-old act, as the Guardian describes it, "has acted as a central shield for minority voters in largely southern states that have relentlessly resisted granting them equal political influence," and has worked for Black voters' rights to "proportionate electoral power." After Wednesday's ruling, this shield is gone.The Daily Show's Josh Johnson responded to the ruling in a segment on Thursday…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Mashable.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Mashable
