Is DDD Overkill for My CRUD Project?
The article discusses the misconception that Domain-Driven Design (DDD) is unnecessary for simple CRUD applications. It argues that all applications, even those that seem straightforward, contain complexities that DDD can help address. The author emphasizes that CRUD is not a true reflection of an application's domain and that understanding the underlying semantics is crucial.
- ▪Many developers believe DDD is overkill for simple CRUD apps, but this perspective overlooks important complexities.
- ▪CRUD operations often mask the true nature of application events, leading to a loss of meaning.
- ▪There are different types of DDD, and while strategic DDD may be unnecessary for small projects, tactical DDD can provide valuable insights.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
Is DDD Overkill for My CRUD Project?¶ We hear it almost every week. A developer leans back, half-smiles, and says something like: "Domain-Driven Design? Sure, for a big enterprise system. But mine is just a simple CRUD app. Wouldn't DDD be total overkill?" The tone is friendly, sometimes even a little apologetic, as if they're letting us down gently. And the reasoning sounds airtight. CRUD is simple. Domain-Driven Design is heavy. Why bring a freight train to move a couch? We get the instinct. Most of us have rolled our eyes at a slide deck full of Bounded Contexts for an app that, frankly, has one table and three buttons. But once you scratch the surface of this question, two different things turn out to be hiding under the same word. One of them really is overkill for your CRUD app.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at Eventsourcingdb.
Discussion
0 commentsMore from Eventsourcingdb
