import-next/no-cycle Reported 0 Cycles on Next.js. We Found Why — and Fixed It.
The article discusses the identification and resolution of bugs in the import-next/no-cycle tool used for analyzing cycles in Next.js. Two significant bugs were found: one related to a depth limit that caused cycles to be missed, and another involving cache contamination that led to inconsistent benchmark results. The fixes have improved the tool's accuracy in detecting cycles in complex codebases.
- ▪The import-next/no-cycle tool initially reported zero cycles in Next.js due to a depth limit of 10 that missed deeper cycles.
- ▪After auditing the tool, two bugs were identified and fixed, including changing the depth limit to effectively unlimited.
- ▪Cache contamination caused inconsistent cycle counts across multiple runs, which was also resolved by resetting analysis-state caches.
Opening excerpt (first ~120 words) tap to expand
try { if(localStorage) { let currentUser = localStorage.getItem('current_user'); if (currentUser) { currentUser = JSON.parse(currentUser); if (currentUser.id === 3669992) { document.getElementById('article-show-container').classList.add('current-user-is-article-author'); } } } } catch (e) { console.error(e); } Ofri Peretz Posted on May 29 • Originally published at ofriperetz.dev import-next/no-cycle Reported 0 Cycles on Next.js. We Found Why — and Fixed It. #javascript #eslint #node #webdev Inside our linter benchmarks (4 Part Series) 1 I Found 3 Real Bugs in Popular ESLint Plugins. Unit Tests Didn't Catch Them. 2 no-cycle finds 0 cycles in next.js (and other lies caches tell you) 3 import-next/no-cycle Reported 0 Cycles on Next.js. We Found Why — and Fixed It.
…
Excerpt limited to ~120 words for fair-use compliance. The full article is at DEV.to (Top).
Discussion
0 commentsMore from DEV.to (Top)
